The camera. The lens.

7df_c077987-em10-20mm

E-M10 with 20mm lens

In my last blog posting, I praised the virtues of Mitchie’s Panasonic Lumix 20mm/1.7 lens – and not for the first time. Together with the Olympus OM-D E-M10 which I’ve got for my birthday this year, it’s – for me – the ideal combination for general photography.

I took this photo with my Olympus E-PL5 camera which has exactly the same sensor as this E-M10, and with the Olympus 45mm/1.8 lens – another one you’d really need for portraits, or for product shots like this one.

Together – again, for me – they’re unbeatable. Except of course when I give this lens back to Mitchie, and use my Panasonic Leica 25mm/1.4, and the 14mm/2.5 as well.

Owning all these, we’re “happy campers” as the Americans say.

Oh, in case you wonder about the lens hood: this is a third-party one. The brand name is JJC, and it’s made of metal. Very cheap, very nice.

And just in case you’re also wondering about the lights I used here: these are two Simock studio strobes with 300Ws each, one from front/above with a 20″ beauty dish at 1/8th power, the other one from behind the camera, a bit to the right, at 1/32nd. Again: very cheap, very nice. Triggered by Yongnuo CTR-301P radio remotes. Aperture measured with a Sekonic light meter. Custom white balance made with a ColorChecker – so the picture is just like out of the camera.

Having the right tools is always fun.

Thanks for reading.

Update from Friday, December 11th, 2015:

Imaging Resource just finished their test of this camera’s successor, the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark 2. And they call it “the most capable all-around camera in its class“. The same was (and still is) true for mine, which is an incredible offer right now as I write this. It’s 599€ vs. 427€ for the body. These prices will change over time of course, but I’d know which one to get.

Another photo of Tuna the cat

Took this one for Zuleikha yesterday, so she could blog about it:

7df_c052469-tuna

Tuna the birthday cat

By the way, I used Mitchie’s Panasonic Lumix 20mm/1.7 lens here, at an aperture of f/2. Still love that one – it’s the perfect lens for the µ43rds system IMO, and this and the Oly 45mm/1.8 would be more or less all you need for a starter kit for general and portrait photography. Highly recommended (and I get nothing for recommendations).

Alternatives would be the 25mm lenses from both Panasonic (f/1.7 or f/1.4) or Olympus (f/1.8), or the 17mm/1.8 Olympus. But 40mm-equivalent is very close to the sensor diagonal, so I consider this one as the real standard lens for the system.

Thanks for viewing.

Sennheiser HD598 SE

This one has a bit of history, for context…

First you’ll have to know that when I was younger, I used to be a musician. I played bass guitar (and my brother Willi even had an acoustic double bass). I was in the studios (EMI Electrola, no less) at the age of 19, so I’m used to good amps, speakers, and headphones and know how music sounds either directly or through very high end equipment.

Some years ago, we needed headphones for Mitchie, and so I bought what I knew was good: AKG K-240 – we’ve used that one in the studios a lot. But for Mitchie it was a bit big and heavy, so later I ordered a slightly smaller K-141 Mk2 for her, and I took the big one.

Alas, it broke. Without any apparent reason. And I thought wow, they used to be a lot more sturdy during my times. Mitchie had some smaller earplugs which she preferred, so I got her K-141.

But that one has a problem as well – it loses its colour on your ears, and it even gets sticky during summer when it’s hot – can’t be healthy, and I thought damn, they now cost more in Euro than they used to cost in German Mark, and still they’re much worse than they were in the good old days. Definitely some cost savings through cheapest material going on here, so AKG doesn’t seem a good choice for the next one…

The next ones were Sennheiser in-ears. I was used to and knew Sennheiser as well, but I’ve never tried in-ears before. And I must say I don’t really like them as much as my brother does. They’re like a plug in your ear, something which disturbs me – don’t know if I could get used to that.

At work I have a Sennheiser HD201, and I bought a second one which Zuleikha uses at her digital Yamaha piano, so she can practice without disturbing anyone. Looks like this:

7df_6181234-zuleikha

These are cheap (around 20€) and sturdy, and they’re good for the purpose like at work or on the piano. But I still was thinking about some better ones.

Our friend Thorsten from Bonn knew that I was looking and found the perfect ‘Black Friday’ deal for me. These ones:

hd598se

These are called Sennheiser HD598 Special Edition, and right now while I write this they are offered for 229€ at Amazon Germany, or for $164.72 at Amazon.com. I’ve paid 99€. So how are they?

In a word: fantastic.

I’ve read that they would lack some bass, so what I tried first was – of course – some bass. Started with Ham Hocks and Cabbage from the Christian McBride Trio album Out Here, and wow – that is some double bass! Nothing missing at all, and I thought hmmm whoever thinks these lack bass probably never heard, felt, or even played one. But maybe they meant something like dynamics? Ok – next I tried Panther from Marcus Miller‘s The Sun Don’t Lie. And again, wow, shake yer booty baby, this was almost unbelievable. Hm, something more melodic? Next was A Remark You Made from Weather Report, with the unforgettable Jaco Pastorius, and by now I was convinced. This was music like it should sound, nothing missing and nothing added, just perfect.

Ok, something else. Maybe guitar? I started Ulf WakeniusBretagne, followed by their very percussive Breakfast in Baghdad. The guitar was perfect, as was Vincent Peirani‘s accordion (and scat vocals), and – again – the double bass played by Lars Danielsson. For comparison, I chose the same song with vocals by Youn Sun Nah, and after that it was Momento Magico, which Ulf Wakenius composed just for her.

Wonderful. Smooth and high-endy, very detailed but never too much of anything, so you can just close your eyes and concentrate onto the music. Definitely the best headphones I’ve ever had, and that by a large margin. Oh, they’re comfortable as well, so maybe I’ll try them on the TV (which is attached to an Onkyo stereo receiver) next. The “SE” (for Special Edition) in the headphone’s name stands for the fact that these are black instead of brown, and they come with two cables – one with 1.2m and small plug, perfect for computer or mobile devices, and one with 3m and big plug (and adapter to small) for the tele or wherever you need some distance.

Perfect. Thanks again to Thorsten for finding that offer. They’re better than my AKG were, so even for the higher price they’re recommendable – but for under 100€ that was a steal definitely. Thanks mate!

My black & white portrait series

I’ve uploaded my black & white portraits again which I took so far this year. I’ve told people that these are for an exhibition, so they know they’ll be publicly displayed. Won’t show all of them in this blog post, but here is one:

7df_7031369-linliang

Linliang

Some other portraits and model photos that I like will follow.

Thanks for viewing.

Some photos of Zuleikha, one more of Tuna

I uploaded some photos of Zuleikha and one of Tuna today. These are like I took them with different cameras, like the Olympus E-520, E-PL1, and E-PL5 (didn’t have my E-M10 yet). Dates range from early 2010 until October of last year:

7dap1021167-zuleikha

7dap5133776-zuleikha

7dbp5291573-zuleikha

7dd_4276657-zuleikha

7de_1120073-zuleikha

7de_a055656-zuleikha

7ddp7310620-tuna

Again, I changed nothing here, there’s neither any “retouching” nor any cropping, not even exposures are changed. All I did was adding some Exif and IPTC titles and tags. Life is too short for the rest – and I’m a photographer, not a painter.

Thanks for viewing.

P.S.: Of course I asked Zuleikha, and she allowed me to upload these. That might change as she grows older, who knows… but maybe she’ll appreciate some memories as she does even now (she loves her baby pics, but these were mostly taken by Mitchie, not by me).

P.P.S.: Tuna was bribed with some cat food. Not while taking her photo with Mitchie’s camera and manually focused OM macro lens, but for allowing me to upload it 😉

The inevitable cat photo(s)

I have my camera set to display black & white since a while. And for the moment, after reading this blog post of Mike Johnston, I decided to also set it back to record only jpg images, in the sRGB colour space. So what I see isn’t only what I get, but I’ll have to live with the results. Which means that I’ll have to do everything just right before I even press the shutter button.

Of course I want to test that in real life, with people, on the streets, everywhere. And with my studio strobes. Here’s a photo of Tuna the cat, my favourite model to test new things and techniques with:

7dfpb222425-tuna

Tuna die Katze – Tuna the cat, November 2015

This was taken with the Olympus OM-D E-M10 camera and with the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 25mm/1.4 fully open at f/1.4 – with the help of my two studio strobes firing at 1/16th power each. Remotely triggered using cheap Yongnuo radio remotes.

Thanks for reading. And thanks of course to Tuna for modeling like a pro.

Sarah

Here’s another photo which I like, from April 2011. Sarah is naked, tho you don’t see much of that:

7dbp4230567-sarah-bw

Sarah, April 2011

B&W Ilford HP5 film simulation, like the one in my former post. But this was taken with my E-520 camera (10MP), and with the 50mm/2 Zuiko Digital Macro lens. Like the one of Zuzana, I took it in the Haenson studios (a bit down South from here).

Thanks for viewing.

P.S.: I dedicate this one to Eve Arnold, who always saw the woman behind the model. That’s why Marilyn trusted her more than any other photographer.

(NSFW) Zuzana

Last year in January I took some photos of a former “playmate”, as they are called by some magazine. Here’s an Ilford HP5 simulation of one of the photos I liked:

7de_1182122-zuzana

Zuzana, January 2014

Thanks for viewing.

This. And that.

This. And that. Pick three… (but if you really want to do so, it has to be today, the offer is time-limited).

Oh, special bonus points if you guess correctly which one (or more?) I would choose. My colleague Arno lost already 😉

About seeing pictures

If you’re really into photography, then after a while you’ll start seeing pictures everywhere. Like in the magazines, catalogues, the online world, even in TV. And sometimes in real life of course. If that hasn’t happened to you (yet), don’t try to force it – you’ll get there.

There are some incredibly good photographers out there, even in the business of moving pictures. Films, TV series, ads – everywhere. But for the makers of TV programs it’s quite hard – the native wide screen 16:9 format for instance isn’t really an ideal one for portraits. Still I see photos all the time, and sometimes I quite like them. Like this:

7df_b022343-gibbs

Mark Harmon as Leroy Jethro Gibbs. Image © CBS

At work, some of my colleagues ordered the new Lenovo X1 Carbon ultrathin notebook as their new work machines for the next years. It’s quite nice, and lighter than a 13.3″ MacBook Pro. When they were setting those up today, I just came around the corner with my camera in my hands, and took this one:

7df_b102345-lenovo-x1

Colleagues working on/with their new Lenovo X1 Carbon

I had to wait for a short moment until Gunther’s hand was in front of Arno’s machine again to catch that behind-the-scene feeling of our workplace.

Nice machines, especially if you’re a mobile worker. I’ll wait for the bigger (and much heavier) Thinkpad W541 because I’m running virtual machines on top of my Linux OS (yes, also at work).

Oh by the way – I’m just leaving the IBM club again, which I joined only because I wanted to be a member of the photo club. Why? Well I guess we’re not that compatible anymore. I just wanna go and find my own way and style. Plus I’m not really into “skin work“. Oh, I’ve done my share of it, even on myself, and later almost perfected it, but I don’t want to create false stuff. Not my world.

Thanks for reading.