<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Wolfgang Lonien</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wolfgang.lonien.de/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wolfgang.lonien.de</link>
	<description>Gedanken während der Pausen...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:20:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hughski ColorHug field report, or &#8220;test&#8221;, or &#8220;review&#8221; by wjl</title>
		<link>http://wolfgang.lonien.de/2012/05/hughski-colorhug-field-report-or-test-or-review/#comment-25070</link>
		<dc:creator>wjl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfgang.lonien.de/?p=2355#comment-25070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is Adrian; I can only recommend it. I also thought my screen was pretty good. But it wasn&#039;t, and now I&#039;m much more confident when processing photos. That Ubuntu was a test only, I do everything with Debian. Thanks for your comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is Adrian; I can only recommend it. I also thought my screen was pretty good. But it wasn&#8217;t, and now I&#8217;m much more confident when processing photos. That Ubuntu was a test only, I do everything with Debian. Thanks for your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Earlier this morning by wjl</title>
		<link>http://wolfgang.lonien.de/2013/05/earlier-this-morning/#comment-25069</link>
		<dc:creator>wjl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfgang.lonien.de/?p=3804#comment-25069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Gregg. Well - dirty like my car is, it could be used for an article about commuting perhaps... oh, and the white balance was OOC, the fluorescent 1 setting of the E-PL1.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gregg. Well &#8211; dirty like my car is, it could be used for an article about commuting perhaps&#8230; oh, and the white balance was OOC, the fluorescent 1 setting of the E-PL1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hughski ColorHug field report, or &#8220;test&#8221;, or &#8220;review&#8221; by Adrian Boliston</title>
		<link>http://wolfgang.lonien.de/2012/05/hughski-colorhug-field-report-or-test-or-review/#comment-25066</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Boliston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 18:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfgang.lonien.de/?p=2355#comment-25066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like a handy bit of hardware if you do photo processing in Ubuntu - my screen (a 21.5&quot; HP ZR22w) &quot;seems&quot; OK without hardware calibration, but might be worth getting a linux compatible calibrator like this]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a handy bit of hardware if you do photo processing in Ubuntu &#8211; my screen (a 21.5&#8243; HP ZR22w) &#8220;seems&#8221; OK without hardware calibration, but might be worth getting a linux compatible calibrator like this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Earlier this morning by Gregg Mack</title>
		<link>http://wolfgang.lonien.de/2013/05/earlier-this-morning/#comment-25065</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 18:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfgang.lonien.de/?p=3804#comment-25065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a strange way, that&#039;s a pretty cool photo!  Looks like it is the beginning of a magazine advertisement. Not for the car, but for something else that I just can&#039;t put my finger on right now.... Maybe it&#039;s because of all the room for text on the left. Nice job on the white balance of the lights.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a strange way, that&#8217;s a pretty cool photo!  Looks like it is the beginning of a magazine advertisement. Not for the car, but for something else that I just can&#8217;t put my finger on right now&#8230;. Maybe it&#8217;s because of all the room for text on the left. Nice job on the white balance of the lights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;We&#8217;re clearly beyond film now&#8221; by wjl</title>
		<link>http://wolfgang.lonien.de/2012/07/were-clearly-beyond-film-now/#comment-24967</link>
		<dc:creator>wjl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 08:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfgang.lonien.de/?p=2656#comment-24967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Peter,

thanks for the nice comment. And yes, that&#039;s a very good and informative article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Peter,</p>
<p>thanks for the nice comment. And yes, that&#8217;s a very good and informative article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;We&#8217;re clearly beyond film now&#8221; by Peter Mao</title>
		<link>http://wolfgang.lonien.de/2012/07/were-clearly-beyond-film-now/#comment-24964</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Mao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 05:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfgang.lonien.de/?p=2656#comment-24964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Wolfgang,

I am slowly making my way through your excellent blog.  On the question of film vs. digital, I found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/film.vs.digital.summary1/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Roger Clark&#039;s summary&lt;/a&gt; of the situation be very useful and informative.  I haven&#039;t seen links to him from you, but you both occasionally link to Luminous Landscape.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Wolfgang,</p>
<p>I am slowly making my way through your excellent blog.  On the question of film vs. digital, I found <a href="http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/film.vs.digital.summary1/index.html" rel="nofollow">Roger Clark&#8217;s summary</a> of the situation be very useful and informative.  I haven&#8217;t seen links to him from you, but you both occasionally link to Luminous Landscape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Looking at a premium product by wjl</title>
		<link>http://wolfgang.lonien.de/2013/05/looking-at-a-premium-product/#comment-24956</link>
		<dc:creator>wjl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 20:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfgang.lonien.de/?p=3783#comment-24956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well Michael,

Puppy sounds like a good choice for a machine like your laptop - and since this OS is so small that you can boot it from almost anything (like USB sticks), you don&#039;t even have to install it to try it out (and see how well it plays together with the hardware).

I don&#039;t know much about Puppy tho - but its &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puppy_linux&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wikipedia entry&lt;/a&gt; points to its homepage and community pages - I&#039;m sure that the guys and gals over there can help you.

Oh, and for books - yes there are still some good sources and publishers, like O&#039;Reilly and the like. I&#039;d visit any good bookstore close to a university, where you can usually find tons of them.

One tip for partitioning, since you&#039;ve mentioned it: try creating only a small root partition (/), and a bigger one for user data (/home). That way, you can install dozens of different small distributions (onto /) without destroying/overwriting your data (on /home) - something all those pre-installed Windows machines almost never had.

But any good Linux quick-start (or like you said &quot;for dummies&quot;) guide should tell you that, and much more.

Hope that helped, and that you&#039;ll enjoy your Linux experience! (Just looked, and Puppy is currently ranked #10 in the most popular distributions at &lt;a href=&quot;http://distrowatch.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Distrowatch&lt;/a&gt;...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Michael,</p>
<p>Puppy sounds like a good choice for a machine like your laptop &#8211; and since this OS is so small that you can boot it from almost anything (like USB sticks), you don&#8217;t even have to install it to try it out (and see how well it plays together with the hardware).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know much about Puppy tho &#8211; but its <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puppy_linux" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia entry</a> points to its homepage and community pages &#8211; I&#8217;m sure that the guys and gals over there can help you.</p>
<p>Oh, and for books &#8211; yes there are still some good sources and publishers, like O&#8217;Reilly and the like. I&#8217;d visit any good bookstore close to a university, where you can usually find tons of them.</p>
<p>One tip for partitioning, since you&#8217;ve mentioned it: try creating only a small root partition (/), and a bigger one for user data (/home). That way, you can install dozens of different small distributions (onto /) without destroying/overwriting your data (on /home) &#8211; something all those pre-installed Windows machines almost never had.</p>
<p>But any good Linux quick-start (or like you said &#8220;for dummies&#8221;) guide should tell you that, and much more.</p>
<p>Hope that helped, and that you&#8217;ll enjoy your Linux experience! (Just looked, and Puppy is currently ranked #10 in the most popular distributions at <a href="http://distrowatch.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Distrowatch</a>&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Looking at a premium product by Michael Matthews</title>
		<link>http://wolfgang.lonien.de/2013/05/looking-at-a-premium-product/#comment-24955</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 19:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfgang.lonien.de/?p=3783#comment-24955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, Wolfgang... 

My problem is a combination of computer illiteracy and the wild overabundance of  Linux programs with either fragmentary how-to instructions or the assumption of a fair amount of prior knowledge on the part of the would-be user.

What I need is a step-by-step guide to installation which doesn&#039;t assume I know how to partition a hard drive. Back in the 80&#039;s DOS era I knew just enough to occasionally edit a line of code to modify the behavior of a bit of simple program, but 25 years of reliance on graphical interfaces has caused even that most rudimentary understanding to disappear.

My goal is to resurrect a late-90s Gateway laptop equipped with a Pentium III processor and, I think, 640 mb of what may be called system RAM. It has at least a couple gigabytes of total RAM and a 12 gigabyte hard drive. All of this sounds OK for the time of its manufacture, but it never did run the OEM-provided Windows 98 properly. My insistence on making it work rather than land-filling it is sheer self-destructive stubbornness.

My thought was that a lightweight Linux OS such as Puppy Linux should work -- and provide a combination of speed, flexibility and a GUI needed for today&#039;s conventional use.

So, with apologies for cluttering your blog with this off-topic query, what I&#039;m looking for is direction to a website or a book (remember those?) which will explain in drop-dead simple language how to acquire and install a program appropriate for that equipment. 

&quot;Linux For Idiots&quot; would be a good working title.

Thanks for your indulgence.

Michael]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Wolfgang&#8230; </p>
<p>My problem is a combination of computer illiteracy and the wild overabundance of  Linux programs with either fragmentary how-to instructions or the assumption of a fair amount of prior knowledge on the part of the would-be user.</p>
<p>What I need is a step-by-step guide to installation which doesn&#8217;t assume I know how to partition a hard drive. Back in the 80&#8242;s DOS era I knew just enough to occasionally edit a line of code to modify the behavior of a bit of simple program, but 25 years of reliance on graphical interfaces has caused even that most rudimentary understanding to disappear.</p>
<p>My goal is to resurrect a late-90s Gateway laptop equipped with a Pentium III processor and, I think, 640 mb of what may be called system RAM. It has at least a couple gigabytes of total RAM and a 12 gigabyte hard drive. All of this sounds OK for the time of its manufacture, but it never did run the OEM-provided Windows 98 properly. My insistence on making it work rather than land-filling it is sheer self-destructive stubbornness.</p>
<p>My thought was that a lightweight Linux OS such as Puppy Linux should work &#8212; and provide a combination of speed, flexibility and a GUI needed for today&#8217;s conventional use.</p>
<p>So, with apologies for cluttering your blog with this off-topic query, what I&#8217;m looking for is direction to a website or a book (remember those?) which will explain in drop-dead simple language how to acquire and install a program appropriate for that equipment. </p>
<p>&#8220;Linux For Idiots&#8221; would be a good working title.</p>
<p>Thanks for your indulgence.</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Looking at a premium product by wjl</title>
		<link>http://wolfgang.lonien.de/2013/05/looking-at-a-premium-product/#comment-24949</link>
		<dc:creator>wjl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 15:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfgang.lonien.de/?p=3783#comment-24949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re welcome Gregg. But no, at the moment I&#039;m not in the market for a new camera. Just posted some thoughts I had...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome Gregg. But no, at the moment I&#8217;m not in the market for a new camera. Just posted some thoughts I had&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Looking at a premium product by wjl</title>
		<link>http://wolfgang.lonien.de/2013/05/looking-at-a-premium-product/#comment-24948</link>
		<dc:creator>wjl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 15:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wolfgang.lonien.de/?p=3783#comment-24948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael,

I&#039;m looking at my E-PL1, and I&#039;m thinking that I really prefer electronic viewfinders by now. But an E-P5 or an E-M5 is currently out of question here - too many other things I have to pay for. But when I compare my wife&#039;s E-PL5 to mine, then I have to admit that those two extra stops of dynamic range are some really strong point indeed. The premium build of these higher-end cameras would just be the icing on the cake.

And sure you can ask questions about Linux, tho other pages (like the one from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.debian.org/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Debian&lt;/a&gt;, which I&#039;m using) could probably tell you more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking at my E-PL1, and I&#8217;m thinking that I really prefer electronic viewfinders by now. But an E-P5 or an E-M5 is currently out of question here &#8211; too many other things I have to pay for. But when I compare my wife&#8217;s E-PL5 to mine, then I have to admit that those two extra stops of dynamic range are some really strong point indeed. The premium build of these higher-end cameras would just be the icing on the cake.</p>
<p>And sure you can ask questions about Linux, tho other pages (like the one from <a href="http://www.debian.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Debian</a>, which I&#8217;m using) could probably tell you more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
