I’m still waiting for my first film to be developed by the local drugstore (who have to send it to some lab), and my second film – black & white this time – is nearly full.
What did I encounter so far?
Well first some bad news, at least for me: my Olympus OM-2N develops the same issue which Zuleikha has with her OM-1 – sometimes they kind of “lock”. Which means that the mirror goes up, the shutter opens – and then it stays that way.
That happened once while I was using the Agfa Precisa CT100 colour slide film, but three times already with my Agfa APX100 black & white one – and so far the film counter is on 30 of 36 pictures.
Wow. So at least 4 pictures ruined, with film not being exactly cheap anyway. I’ve looked around a bit, and it seems to be a mechanical problem, and the process to fix it isn’t really trivial at all – see here if you’re interested.
So it’s back to digital? I don’t know, I’ll decide after I’ve got my second film full and back from the lab. In the mean time, I was looking at some older pictures from 2012, and photographed a few negatives and slides with my E-M10, my ZD 50mm/2 macro lens, and a slide copier. Here are two of these:
Zuleikha, Mörfelden-Walldorf 2012 (got a hair on my negative)
This is Kodak BW400CN, an ISO 400 black & white film based on the C-41 colour negative process, which means that development is cheap and fast, and prints also don’t cost that much. It’s a very fine grain for ISO 400, no bad film at all. Ilford has some similar one called XP2, and both are not cheap (like APX100 would be in the local drugstore).
And though I’ve got one of my big fat blond hairs on the negative, Zuleikha still finds that “scan” much better than the low-res lab scan you can also opt for during development.
Here’s another one:
Zuleikha, Mörfelden-Walldorf 2012
This is Agfa Precisa CT100, the same one that I’m currently waiting for (except that this one wasn’t expired yet while I used it). I’ve decided to show an uncropped view through my slide copier, as my camera “sees” it when using my 50mm macro lens. The lighting wasn’t flash like in the first black & white one, but our LED room light, so I did this one on a tripod with delay. The white balance was set to the white wall which I used as a background, so what you see is the actual film colours overlayed by the colours of my E-M10, which I turned down all the way (like contrast as well). The rest is pretty much like out of camera; you can achieve something similar when simply setting the camera as described (contrast -2, saturation -2), and using the out-of-camera jpg.
Very vivid, isn’t it? And still kind of “natural”, an almost “organic” result with some quite pleasing skin tones. By far not as sharp and detailed as digital, but I still love it.
In the meantime, we’ve had the “Luminale” here in Frankfurt; a yearly light festival where they put lots of artificial illumination up onto and inside of some buildings. My colleague Basti wanted to see it, and he brought his Nikon D810 to get some photos of it.
It’s very rare that he brings that camera to the workplace, and this time he allowed me to use and to compare it to mine, so I took the same picture (of him) with both my Olympus OM-D E-M10 and the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 25mm/1.4 and with his Nikon D810 and a 50mm/1.4G lens, both set to f/4. Don’t know whether I could show these here (I haven’t asked for it so far), but except the difference in depth of field, those pictures were quite similar on first sight.
On a second view, I noticed of course that his camera has a lot more leeway once you start to move some sliders in your raw converter, and I also liked the look of his 50mm lens at f/4 better than the one of my 25mm lens when using the same aperture – should have used f/2 on mine…
… which is what I just did with my OM-2N (at f/4) and my “digicam” at f/2; see my “featured” image above (the film is still in the camera of course). Depth of field in these should be about the same, and it will be interesting to see if I can get my digital image to look anywhere close to that film when I have it back.
Speaking of which: Google decided to just lower the price for the entire Nik collection to zero – yup, you’ve got that right, they give it away for free! I cannot make much use of it, since these are Lightroom and Photoshop plugins, both of which I don’t have and use. But anyway, Nik Silver Efex Pro is maybe the best of all black & white converters around, so go and download the entire collection here. Thanks Google, that is an amazing present!
As always, thanks for looking and/or reading.